Artificial Intelligence, Green Innovation, and Firm Performance: Evidence from Emerging Economies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64534/ref79s85Keywords:
AI-related technological orientation, green innovation, selected BRICS Plus countries, industrial automation, sectoral heterogeneity, R&D capability, equivalence testing.Abstract
There are two types of artificial intelligence (AI) – sector-specific and technological – that can contribute to environmental innovation, but each one is context-dependent. Firm-level data are analyzed for firms in selected BRICS Plus countries. The country coverage is based on 2024 technology classifications, 2020-2024 averaged controls and 2015-2024 secondary performance panels. The design combines topic and category classification, averaged firm controls, and panel performance results. The difference in the probability of green-innovation classification was not statistically significant for broad AI classification. Large average differences are rejected by equivalence tests only at the broader pre-specified margin, and matching and weighting estimates are close to zero after improved observed covariate balance. The near-zero average masks important technological and sectoral variation. Industrial automation, as well as the Artificial Intelligence category, machine learning, predictive analytics and process automation, are positively associated with green innovation, whereas the latter is negatively associated after false-discovery-rate adjustment. One possible explanation for this is technological proximity to production: while the AI that relies more on technology than on software can have a more direct impact on energy, materials, process control, and maintenance, the AI that relies more on software has more general functionality and may be used more for commercial, financial, risk, and administrative purposes. The evidence of country interaction is not statistically significant, while the country-level inference is constrained by the common support, and the heterogeneity is more pronounced at the sectoral level. R&D proxies and intangible-capability proxies do not materially strengthen the association between AI-related technological orientation and green-innovation classification, even though AI-classified firms are more R&D-oriented. These findings support a conditional-deployment view: the environmental relevance of AI-related technological orientation depends on application domain, sectoral production architecture, and strategic orientation. Because classifications are undated, the results should be read as conditional associations rather than causal adoption effects.
References
Al Halbusi, H., Al-Sulaiti, K. I., Alalwan, A. A., & Al-Busaidi, A. S. (2025). AI capability and green innovation impact on sustainable performance: Moderating role of big data and knowledge management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 210, 123897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123897
Alemu, F. M. (2026). Investments in human capital and digitalization: Pathways to reducing energy poverty in emerging african economies. Sustainable Development, (First published: 25 February 2026). https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70833
Ashraf, M., & Ghazali, A. (2026). Digital infrastructure readiness, environmental technology development, and environmental sustainability: Evidence from asean-6 economies. Innovation and Green Development, 5(4), 100388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2026.100388
Bi, P. (2026). Financial resource allocation, urban innovation incentive policies, and innovation efficiency enhancement. Economic Analysis and Policy, 93, 708-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2026.07.035
Bolón-Canedo, V., Morán-Fernández, L., Cancela, B., & Alonso-Betanzos, A. (2024). A review of green artificial intelligence: Towards a more sustainable future. Neurocomputing, 599, 128096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128096
Cheng, K., Jin, Z., & Wu, G. (2024). Unveiling the role of artificial intelligence in influencing enterprise environmental performance: Evidence from china. Journal of Cleaner Production, 440, 140934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140934
Chun, Y., & Hwang, J. (2025). The nexus of artificial intelligence and green innovation: A cross-density analysis at the country level. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(1), 1688-1716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02076-8
Feng, F., Li, J., Zhang, F., & Sun, J. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on green innovation efficiency: Moderating role of dynamic capability. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96, 103649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103649
Greif, L., Kimmig, A., El Bobbou, S., Jurisch, P., & Ovtcharova, J. (2024). Strategic view on the current role of ai in advancing environmental sustainability: A swot analysis. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00146-z
Han, Y., Li, Z., Feng, T., Qiu, S., Hu, J., Yadav, K. K., & Obaidullah, A. J. (2024). Unraveling the impact of digital transformation on green innovation through microdata and machine learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 354, 120271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120271
Hao, B., Wang, Z., & Yin, L. (2026). Research on the impact mechanism of monetary policy shocks and the synergy of human capital structure on corporate investment. Applied Economics, (Published online: 22 Jul 2026). https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2026.2706696
Hripcsak, G., Zhang, L., Chen, Y., Li, K., Suchard, M. A., Ryan, P. B., & Schuemie, M. J. (2025). Assessing covariate balance with small sample sizes. Statistics in Medicine, 44(18-19), e70212. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70212
Jin, J., & Wang, Y. (2025). Can public data openness reduce carbon emissions of listed companies? Evidence from china. Energy Reports, 13, 5512-5524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.05.006
Kaack, L. H., Donti, P. L., Strubell, E., Kamiya, G., Creutzig, F., & Rolnick, D. (2022). Aligning artificial intelligence with climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 12(6), 518-527. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01377-7
Lakens, D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177
Li, H., Liu, Z., & Hachard, V. (2024). Digital transformation driving green innovation: Evidence from chinese a-share firms. International Review of Economics & Finance, 95, 103487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103487
Liang, Y., You, J., Wang, R., Wang, X., Dong, L., & Lyu, M. (2025). Data provider research overview from a public management perspective: A bibliometric analysis utilizing citespace. Journal of Big Data, 12(1), 248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-025-01294-4
Lin, J., Zeng, Y., Wu, S., & Luo, X. (2024). How does artificial intelligence affect the environmental performance of organizations? The role of green innovation and green culture. Information & Management, 61(2), 103924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2024.103924
Lyu, W., Wang, T., Hou, R., & Liu, J. (2023). Going green and profitable: The impact of smart manufacturing on chinese enterprises. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 181, 109324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109324
Ma, S., Ding, W., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Ren, S., Kong, X., & Leng, J. (2024). Industry 4.0 and cleaner production: A comprehensive review of sustainable and intelligent manufacturing for energy-intensive manufacturing industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 467, 142879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142879
Maug, E. (2026). Financing human capital: A survey and synthesis. Foundations and Trends in Finance, 15(2), 213-376. https://doi.org/10.1108/FTFIN-04-2025-0067
Nasaj, M. (2026). Corporate digital responsibility and green innovation: A strategic model for sustainable competitive advantage. Management Decision, (June 15, 2026). https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2025-1670
Osei, A., & Amoah, Joseph O. (2026). Pathways to sustainable competitive advantage: Integrating firm-level sustainability targets, eco-innovation, and sustainable governance for circular business transformation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 35(5), 7248-7274. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70531
Priya, P. (2026). The innovation channel of monetary policy and credit supply shocks on firm investment: Evidence from r&d-intensive firms in india. Emerging Markets Review, 73, 101479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2026.101479
Qu, X., Eggers, J. P., & Kumar, M. V. S. (2026). Unlocking novel knowledge recombinations: The effect of artificial intelligence on inventive activity. Strategic Management Journal, (First published: 12 March 2026). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.70080
Rodriguez-Garcia, P., Juan, A. A., Martin, J. A., Lopez-Lopez, D., & Marco, J. M. (2026). Ai-driven optimization of project portfolios in corporate ecosystems with synergies and strategic factors. Expert Systems with Applications, 298, 129593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129593
Saeed, U. F., & Bayong, D. (2026). Artificial intelligence and carbon performance: The complementary roles of responsible innovation and regulatory quality in mena manufacturing firms. Business Strategy & Development, 9(1), e70285. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70285
Tao, A., Wang, C., Zhang, S., & Kuai, P. (2024). Does enterprise digital transformation contribute to green innovation? Micro-level evidence from china. Journal of Environmental Management, 370, 122609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122609
Tseng, C.-J., & Lin, S.-Y. (2024). Role of artificial intelligence in carbon cost reduction of firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 447, 141413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141413
Wan, W., Murugesan, M., Nocon, R. S., Bolton, J., Konetzka, R. T., Chin, M. H., & Huang, E. S. (2024). Comparison of two propensity score-based methods for balancing covariates: The overlap weighting and fine stratification methods in real-world claims data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 24(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02228-z
Wang, B., Khan, I., Ge, C., & Naz, H. (2024). Digital transformation of enterprises promotes green technology innovation - the regulated mediation model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 209, 123812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123812
Wang, X., & Zhong, X. (2024). Digital transformation and green innovation: Firm-level evidence from china [Original Research]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12 - 2024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1389255
Wu, F., Dogan, B., Tiwari, S., Ghosh, S., Bashir, M. F., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2026). From policy to practice: How eco-innovation, green finance, and environmental taxes drive carbon neutrality and sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 34(2), 2146-2165. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70422
Wu, W., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence innovation and environmental performance: Unraveling the complex roles of application and method innovation across enterprise sizes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 218, 124211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124211
Xiao, J., Li, T., Luan, Y., & Chen, X. (2026). Structural characteristics and evolutionary trajectories of knowledge recombination in the field of ai-driven drug discovery. Scientific Reports, 16(1), 19296. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-50574-3
Xu, C., Sun, G., & Kong, T. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on enterprise green innovation. International Review of Economics & Finance, 90, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.11.001
Xu, J., Yu, Y., Zhang, M., & Zhang, J. Z. (2023). Impacts of digital transformation on eco-innovation and sustainable performance: Evidence from chinese manufacturing companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 393, 136278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136278
Xu, W., Zhang, L., Li, K., Twum, A. K., & Amoah, J. O. (2026). Empowering firms to enhance sustainable supply chain strategies for competitive environmental performance: Firm-level evidence on governance and sustainable business model innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, (First published: 08 June 2026). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71119
Yao, N., Bai, J., Yu, Z., & Guo, Q. (2025). Does ai orientation facilitate operational efficiency? A contingent strategic orientation perspective. Journal of Business Research, 186, 114994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114994
Yavuz, O., Uner, M. M., Okumus, F., & Karatepe, O. M. (2023). Industry 4.0 technologies, sustainable operations practices and their impacts on sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 387, 135951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135951
Ye, F., Ouyang, Y., & Li, Y. (2023). Digital investment and environmental performance: The mediating roles of production efficiency and green innovation. International Journal of Production Economics, 259, 108822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108822
Zhou, W., Zhang, Y., & Li, X. (2024). Artificial intelligence, green technological progress, energy conservation, and carbon emission reduction in china: An examination based on dynamic spatial durbin modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 446, 141142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141142
Zhu, X., & Liang, Z. (2026). Does artificial intelligence increase green total factor productivity in manufacturing? Based on the perspective of industrial robot sources. Journal of Cleaner Production, 571, 148732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.148732
